This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0261927X07313653v1 27/2/168    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rubini, M. Articles by Menegatti, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Linguistic Bias in Personnel Selection

Utrecht U

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: monica.rubini{at}unibo.it.

	Abstract

The present research examines how hiring committees strategically use language abstraction to collectively account for their decision to hire a job applicant over the others. In addition, the authors investigate how work interdependence between single members of hiring committees and applicants and common affiliation to the same work organization affect the language used to write individual reports on job candidates. Results of the first study show that selected applicants were described with positive terms at a higher level of abstraction and negative terms at a lower level of abstraction. The second study supports the selection linguistic bias in individually written reports and demonstrates that members of hiring committees describe interdependent applicants and those belonging to their group with negative terms at a lower level of abstraction than other applicants. The implications of the findings for the wider personnel selection context are discussed.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?