This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Edelsky, C. Articles by Adams, K. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Creating Inequality: Breaking the Rules in Debates

Karen Adams

Arizona State University, Division of Curriculum and Instruction, Tempe, AR 85287-0911, USA

As both unabashed contests for power and forums for political candidates who, presumably, already have relatively substantial societal power, political debates offer a site for investigating the creation of more powerful language use for some, less powerful for others. Since the canonical debate form promises an equal distribution of turns and topic control to all debators through prespecification of practically everything that might vary in conversation (Sacks, Schegloff & Jefferson, 1974), the instances within actual debate which violate rules for prespecification are prime sites for revealing gender issues. The out of order and oddly functioning talk in six televised political debates was analysed, holding the promise of fairness of canonical debates as a yardstick. Un-rule-y talk violated rules for who was to speak (uninvited and out of turn order UNs) and what was to be happening (unexpected and oddly functioning MOVEs). UNs and MOVEs were categorised, sorted, and analysed as to where they occurred, who did them, what special features they had, and what consequences they had for subsequent topics, turns, and event structuring. The analysis has implications for the study of gender and language as well as the study and conduct of political debates.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. L. Blas-Arroyo `Perdoneme que se lo diga, pero vuelve usted a faltar a la verdad, senor Gonzalez': Form and Function of Politic Verbal Behaviour in Face-to-Face Spanish Political Debates Discourse Society, July 1, 2003; 14(4): 395 - 423. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. SHAW Language, Gender and Floor Apportionment in Political Debates Discourse Society, July 1, 2000; 11(3): 401 - 418. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. H. Ng, M. Brooke, and M. Dunne Interruption and Influence in Discussion Groups Journal of Language and Social Psychology, December 1, 1995; 14(4): 369 - 381. [Abstract]

				J. Holmes Women's Talk in Public Contexts Discourse Society, April 1, 1992; 3(2): 131 - 150. [Abstract]