Journal of Language and Social Psychology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walker, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Trimboli, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Vol. 8, No. 3-4, 229-248 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X8983005

Communicating Affect: The Role of Verbal and Nonverbal Content

Michael B. Walker

Antonietta Trimboli

Department of Psychology, University of Sydney, N. S. W. 2006, Australia

The role of nonverbal signals in communicating affect is not well understood. Recent research has both emphasised and played down the importance of the nonverbal signals relative to what is said. A careful examination of the evidence shows that the data in favour of and against nonverbal dominance come from two different empirical approaches. It is argued that both approaches are methodologically unsound. A new approach to the question is developed based on the assumption that the communication channel which maintains the affective tone of the interaction is the primary channel by which affect is being communicated. The affective tone of the interaction can be established by examining the communicational context for any given message. This assumption allows mixed messages, in which the verbal and nonverbal channels are conveying opposed affective tones, to be analysed for channel dominance. Sixteen segments from interviews televised live were examined. In twelve of the sixteen segments the nonverbal channels carried the affective tone. A detailed analysis of subject explanations for the remaining four segments revealed that affective messages are sometimes complex combinations of cues in which the roles of the verbal and nonverbal channels are interwoven to communicate several messages simultaneously.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
J. B. Walther
Language and Communication Technology: Introduction to the Special Issue
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, December 1, 2004; 23(4): 384 - 396.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
C. GALLOIS
The Language and Communication of Emotion: Universal, Interpersonal, or Intergroup?
American Behavioral Scientist, January 1, 1993; 36(3): 309 - 338.