Journal of Language and Social Psychology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to browse PSPB online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MacMartin, C.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Vol. 24, No. 2, 139-159 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X05275735

Sexual Motives and Sentencing

Judicial Discourse in Cases of Child Sexual Abuse

Clare MacMartin

University of Guelph, cmacmart{at}uoguelph.ca

Linda A. Wood

University of Guelph

The motives ascribed to offenders in the sentencing of sexual abuse crimes can be highly contentious. Some critics claim that sexual assaults are acts of power and violence and that reference to sexual motives minimizes violence and the seriousness of the offense. The present study examines 74 Canadian judicial sentencing decisions (1993-1997) involving offenders who had sexually abused children and adolescents. Using discursive social psychology, the authors analyze judicial explanations for the offenses, and their implications for mitigation and aggravation. Violent attributions were rare. Sex-based explanations predominated, variously invoking the selfish gratification of offenders’ sexual desires, sexual impulses, pedophilia, and offenders’ attraction to victims. However, in contrast to critics’ claims, these explanations are used by judges to emphasize the seriousness of these crimes. The findings highlight the importance of analyzing discourse in relation to action sequences rather than in isolation. The authors discuss the implications for the study of sexual assault and legal discourse.

Key Words: attribution • discourse analysis • sentencing decisions • sexual abuse • sexual offenders • violence


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Feminist CriminologyHome page
G. Balfour
Falling Between the Cracks of Retributive and Restorative Justice: The Victimization and Punishment of Aboriginal Women
Feminist Criminology, April 1, 2008; 3(2): 101 - 120.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
L. A. Wood and C. MacMartin
Constructing Remorse: Judges' Sentencing Decisions in Child Sexual Assault Cases
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, December 1, 2007; 26(4): 343 - 362.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Punishment SocietyHome page
B. Bouhours and K. Daly
Youth sex offenders in court: An analysis of judicial sentencing remarks
Punishment Society, October 1, 2007; 9(4): 371 - 394.
[Abstract] [PDF]