Journal of Language and Social Psychology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Learn about Basics of Communication

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bull, P.
Right arrow Articles by Noordhuizen, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Vol. 19, No. 3, 275-294 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X00019003001

The Mistiming of Applause in Political Speeches

Peter Bull

University of York

Merel Noordhuizen

University of Amsterdam

According to Atkinson, speakers at political meetings invite applause through rhetorical devices, which indicate when and where applause is appropriate. Hence, speech and applause are characterized by a high degree of synchronization. Thus, incidences of unsynchronized applause are of considerable theoretical interest. An analysis of such mismatches is reported based on six speeches delivered by the three leaders of the principal British political parties to their respective party conferences in 1996 and 1997. Only a mean 61% of applause incidences were fully synchronized with speech. Four principal types of mismatch were identified: isolated applause, delayed applause, interruptive applause, and applause interrupted by the speaker. Mismatches occurred when rhetorical devices were ineffective. They also occurred in the absence of rhetorical devices when applause was not invited. It is concluded that Atkinson’s theory of rhetoric needs to be modified to take account of a distinction between invited and uninvited applause.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
P. Wells and P. Bull
From Politics to Comedy: A Comparative Analysis of Affiliative Audience Responses
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, December 1, 2007; 26(4): 321 - 342.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
D. Greatbatch and T. Clark
Displaying Group Cohesiveness: Humour and Laughter in the Public Lectures of Management Gurus
Human Relations, December 1, 2003; 56(12): 1515 - 1544.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
P. Bull and P. Wells
By Invitation Only?: An Analysis of Invited and Uninvited Applause
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, September 1, 2002; 21(3): 230 - 244.
[Abstract] [PDF]