Journal of Language and Social Psychology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Learn about Basics of Communication

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holtgraves, T.
Right arrow Articles by Lasky, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Vol. 18, No. 2, 196-205 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X99018002004

Linguistic Power and Persuasion

Thomas Holtgraves

Ball State University, 00t0holtgrav{at}bsuvc.bsu.edu

Benjamin Lasky

Ball State University

This study examined the role of linguistic power in persuasion. Participants listened to a persuasive message conveyed in either a powerless style (frequent hedges, hesitations, and tag questions) or a powerful style (the absence of these features). In addition, the ability of participants to process the message and speaker gender were manipulated. Participants who heard the powerless version perceived the speaker and the arguments more negatively and were less in favor of the message proposal than were participants who heard the same message in a powerful style. These effects occurred regardless of whether participants were able to process the message deeply. There was also evidence that the effects of linguistic power on persuasion are mediated by its effects on perceptions of the speaker and the message arguments.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Discourse StudiesHome page
P. G. Lange
An implicature for um: signaling relative expertise
Discourse Studies, April 1, 2008; 10(2): 191 - 204.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
D.S. Moskowitz, M.-h. R. Ho, and A.-M. Turcotte-Tremblay
Contextual Influences on Interpersonal Complementarity
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 2007; 33(8): 1051 - 1063.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
L. A. Hosman and S. A. Siltanen
Powerful and Powerless Language Forms: Their Consequences for Impression Formation, Attributions of Control of Self and Control of Others, Cognitive Responses, and Message Memory
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, March 1, 2006; 25(1): 33 - 46.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
L. A. Hosman, T. M. Huebner, and S. A. Siltanen
The Impact of Power-of-Speech Style, Argument Strength, and Need for Cognition on Impression Formation, Cognitive Responses, and Persuasion
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, December 1, 2002; 21(4): 361 - 379.
[Abstract] [PDF]