Journal of Language and Social Psychology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hannah, A.
Right arrow Articles by Murachver, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Vol. 18, No. 2, 153-174 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X99018002002

Gender and Conversational Style as Predictors of Conversational Behavior

Annette Hannah

University of Otago

Tamar Murachver

University of Otago, tamar{at}psy.otago.ac.nz

Because gender and speech style co-vary, effects that have been attributed to speakers’ gender-based status might in fact be consequences of how people respond to particular styles of speech. To examine the relative impact of gender and speech style on conversants’ speech behavior, female and male confederates were trained to employ a facilitative or a nonfacilitative style of speech in interactions with young adults. Analyses of participants’ conversations with confederates showed that confederate speech style, rather than confederate gender, was a more reliable predictor of participants’ speech behavior. In conjunction with analyses of participant accommodation to confederate speech, the results revealed subtle differences in how women and men responded to the behavior of confederates.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
C. Leaper and M. M. Ayres
A Meta-Analytic Review of Gender Variations in Adults' Language Use: Talkativeness, Affiliative Speech, and Assertive Speech
Personality and Social Psychology Review, November 1, 2007; 11(4): 328 - 363.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
A. Hannah and T. Murachver
Gender Preferential Responses to Speech
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, September 1, 2007; 26(3): 274 - 290.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
K. Robertson and T. Murachver
Intimate Partner Violence: Linguistic Features and Accommodation Behavior of Perpetrators and Victims
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, December 1, 2006; 25(4): 406 - 422.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
L. Karakowsky, K. McBey, and D. L. Miller
Gender, Perceived Competence, and Power Displays: Examining Verbal Interruptions in a Group Context
Small Group Research, August 1, 2004; 35(4): 407 - 439.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
K. Robertson and T. Murachver
Children's Speech Accommodation to Gendered Language Styles
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, September 1, 2003; 22(3): 321 - 333.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
A. Colley and Z. Todd
Gender-Linked Differences in the Style and Content of E-Mails to Friends
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, December 1, 2002; 21(4): 380 - 392.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language TestingHome page
S. Takala and F. Kaftandjieva
Test fairness: a DIF analysis of an L2 vocabulary test
Language Testing, July 1, 2000; 17(3): 323 - 340.
[Abstract] [PDF]