Journal of Language and Social Psychology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Learn about Basics of Communication

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bull, P.
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Vol. 17, No. 2, 220-244 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X980172005

Level of Threat

A Means of Assessing Interviewer Toughness and Neutrality

Peter Bull

Judy Elliott

University of York

Eighteen interviews televised during the 1992 British General Election were analyzed to evaluate six leading political interviewers in terms of toughness and neutrality. Tough questions were defined as those where each of the principal modes of possible response presented some form of face-threat (cf. no-necessary-threat questions, which allowed at least one type of response that was not intrinsically face-threatening). Brian Walden emerged as the toughest interviewer, with 49.4% of his questions carryinga face-threat in every direction; David Frost was the softest (28.9% of questions). An analysis in terms of neutrality showed that most interviewers gave John Major the toughest interviews and Paddy Ashdown the easiest interviews, except for Frost, whose interviews showed the opposite trend. These findings were elaborated by a content analysis using 19 categories of face-threat and a questionnaire in which observers rated the six interviewers in terms of toughness and neutrality.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
A. Gnisci and M. Bonaiuto
Grilling Politicians: Politicians' Answers to Questions in Television Interviews and Courtroom Examinations
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, December 1, 2003; 22(4): 385 - 413.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
P. Bull
Equivocation and the Rhetoric of Modernization: An Analysis of Televised Interviews with Tony Blair in the 1997 British General Election
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, June 1, 2000; 19(2): 222 - 247.
[Abstract] [PDF]