This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bull, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Equivocation Theory and News Interviews

University of York, United Kingdom

According to a theory devised by Bavelas and colleagues, equivocation occurs in response to avoidance-avoidance conflicts. This article argues that this theory provides a valuable conceptual framework for the analysis of news interviews; in addition, some modifications are discussed. It proposes that the concept of threats to face can be used to provide a theoretical underpinning for why avoidance-avoidance conflicts occur in the context of political interviews. It is further argued that different forms of equivocation have different interactional consequences, which is not adequately represented in Bavelas and colleagues' theory: For example, implicit replies can be shown to have significant interactional advantages over nonreplies. Finally, whereas Bavelas and colleagues conduct their analysis at the level of each individual question, in some circumstances, avoidance-avoidance conflicts may also operate at the level of the interview as a whole; both levels of analysis must be considered for fuller understanding ofpressures toward equivocation.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				X. Jiang Cross-cultural pragmatic differences in US and Chinese press conferences: the case of the North Korea nuclear crisis Discourse Society, March 1, 2006; 17(2): 237 - 257. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. E. Link and R. J. Kreuz The Comprehension of Ostensible Speech Acts Journal of Language and Social Psychology, September 1, 2005; 24(3): 227 - 251. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Bello and R. Edwards Interpretations of Messages: The Influence of Various Forms of Equivocation, Face Concerns, and Sex Differences Journal of Language and Social Psychology, June 1, 2005; 24(2): 160 - 181. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Bull Equivocation and the Rhetoric of Modernization: An Analysis of Televised Interviews with Tony Blair in the 1997 British General Election Journal of Language and Social Psychology, June 1, 2000; 19(2): 222 - 247. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. BELLO Determinants of Equivocation: The Influence of Situational Formality, Interaction Phase, and Ambiguity Tolerance Communication Research, April 1, 2000; 27(2): 161 - 193. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. B. Bavelas Theoretical and Methodological Principles of the Equivocation Project Journal of Language and Social Psychology, June 1, 1998; 17(2): 183 - 199. [Abstract]

				M. A. Hamilton and P. J. Mineo A Framework for Understanding Equivocation Journal of Language and Social Psychology, March 1, 1998; 17(1): 3 - 35. [Abstract]