This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hamilton, M. A. Articles by Mineo, P. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

A Framework for Understanding Equivocation

Paul James Mineo

University of Connecticut-Storrs

Information processing theory was used to develop a general model of equivocation that takes into account the various forms of linguistic specificity beyond responsiveness to questions, as well as receivers' comprehensive processing of message content. The model posits causal effects of language specificity and message length on receivers' perceptions of linguistic specificity and their assessments of message clarity, position advocated, and personalization. The results of meta-analyses and causal models of conversation ratings show that message length decreased perceived linguistic specificity but increased message clarity and personalization, perceived specificity increased clarity and identification of position advocated, and clarity increased identification of position advocated and personalization. The immediacy ofthe channel ofpresentation enhanced the role of specificity in the model and inhibited the role of clarity in the model. The practical implications of these findings for the use of equivocation are discussed.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. E. Link and R. J. Kreuz The Comprehension of Ostensible Speech Acts Journal of Language and Social Psychology, September 1, 2005; 24(3): 227 - 251. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Gnisci and M. Bonaiuto Grilling Politicians: Politicians' Answers to Questions in Television Interviews and Courtroom Examinations Journal of Language and Social Psychology, December 1, 2003; 22(4): 385 - 413. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Bull Equivocation and the Rhetoric of Modernization: An Analysis of Televised Interviews with Tony Blair in the 1997 British General Election Journal of Language and Social Psychology, June 1, 2000; 19(2): 222 - 247. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Galasinski Strategies of Talking to Each Other: Rule Breaking in Polish Presidential Debates Journal of Language and Social Psychology, June 1, 1998; 17(2): 165 - 182. [Abstract]

				J. B. Bavelas Theoretical and Methodological Principles of the Equivocation Project Journal of Language and Social Psychology, June 1, 1998; 17(2): 183 - 199. [Abstract]

				M. A. Hamilton Message Variables That Mediate and Moderate the Effect of Equivocal Language on Source Credibility Journal of Language and Social Psychology, March 1, 1998; 17(1): 109 - 143. [Abstract]