This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hamilton, M. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Message Variables That Mediate and Moderate the Effect of Equivocal Language on Source Credibility

University of Connecticut-Storrs

Equivocation is advisable as a persuasive strategy only under limited conditions. Information-processing theory was used to model the effect of precise language on receiver evaluations of message and source. Path analyses found that the effects of language intensity (specificity and opinionatedness) on ratings of source competence and trust-worthiness were mediated by language perceptions and message evaluation variables such as assessed argument quality. The effect of language intensity on trustworthiness was mediated by attributions of either source bias or intolerance of discrepant opinions. Meta-analyses found that message discrepancy and personalization of the issue made the effects of intense language on competence more negative, whereas better quality arguments made the effect of intensity on competence and trustworthiness more positive.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. R. Hafdahl Combining Correlation Matrices: Simulation Analysis of Improved Fixed-Effects Methods Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, June 1, 2007; 32(2): 180 - 205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. BELLO Determinants of Equivocation: The Influence of Situational Formality, Interaction Phase, and Ambiguity Tolerance Communication Research, April 1, 2000; 27(2): 161 - 193. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. B. Bavelas Theoretical and Methodological Principles of the Equivocation Project Journal of Language and Social Psychology, June 1, 1998; 17(2): 183 - 199. [Abstract]

				M. A. Hamilton and P. J. Mineo A Framework for Understanding Equivocation Journal of Language and Social Psychology, March 1, 1998; 17(1): 3 - 35. [Abstract]