Journal of Language and Social Psychology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Learn about Basics of Communication

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leets, L.
Right arrow Articles by Giles, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Vol. 14, No. 1-2, 102-123 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X95141006

Fans

Exploring Expressed Motivations for Contacting Celebrities

Laura Leets

University of California, Santa Barbara

Gavin De Becker

Gavin de Becker, Inc.

Howard Giles

University of California, Santa Barbara

Social psychological studies of language cover a wide range of research domains, most of which ignore written communication to societally visible figures. Toward ameliorating this, the authors focus on letters written to Hollywood celebrities. The authors'goal is to extend the 1991 research of Dietz et al. that has examined threatening and inappropriate letters to entertainment celebrities. The authors present a comparative view by investigating the features of normal fan behavior. A total of 294 university students were asked to express their motivations for contacting celebrities. Next, 83 fan letters received by one Hollywood celebrity were content analyzed in terms of the senders' motivations for writing. The authors compared the university students' rationale to the ones articulated in the actual letters and also compared the latter with characteristics found in Dietz et al. `s more sinister sample. Finally, a case study of one fan is undertaken to illustrate how distinguishing between a sycophantic fan and the obsessed unwanted pursuer poses a challenging task.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J Offender Ther Comp CriminolHome page
L. B. Schlesinger
Celebrity Stalking, Homicide, and Suicide: A Psychological Autopsy
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, February 1, 2006; 50(1): 39 - 46.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social ScienceHome page
F. S. CALHOUN
Violence Toward Judicial Officials
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, July 1, 2001; 576(1): 54 - 68.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
T. Cole and L. Leets
Attachment Styles and Intimate Television Viewing: Insecurely Forming Relationships in a Parasocial Way
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, August 1, 1999; 16(4): 495 - 511.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
C. Gallois and J. Pittam
Social Psychological Approaches to Using Natural Language Texts
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, March 1, 1995; 14(1-2): 5 - 17.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
J. Potter and M. Wetherell
Natural Order: Why Social Psychologists should Study (a Constructed Version of) Natural Language, and Why they Have Not Done So
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, March 1, 1995; 14(1-2): 216 - 222.
[Abstract]