Journal of Language and Social Psychology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hawkins, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Vol. 10, No. 3, 185-203 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X91103003

Some Consequences of Deep Interruption in Task-Oriented Communication

Katherine Hawkins

Department of Communication Studies, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas 79409-3083, USA

This research investigates the consequences of deep interruption in task-oriented communication in terms of subsequent turn-taking and listeners' evaluations of deep interrupters. In the first part of the investigation, 116 incidents of deep interruption in small group communication were studied. Although the majority of deep interruptions were unsuccessful in the first attempt, interruptors eventually succeeded in securing the next turn-at-talk significantly more often than not. In the second part of the investigation, 369 respondents from undergraduate speech communication courses watched videotaped interactions between either mixed-or same-sex dyads. A sample of the interactions included two deep interruptions by one speaker of another; the balance did not. Results indicated that interrupters were perceived to be more dynamic, yet less generally attractive, and less appropriate in their communication behaviour, than those they interrupted. Implications of these findings, as well as directions for further research of deep interruption in communication, are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
H. Z. Li
Cooperative and Intrusive Interruptions in Inter- and Intracultural Dyadic Discourse
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, September 1, 2001; 20(3): 259 - 284.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
C. L. Crown and D. A. Cummins
Objective Versus Perceived Vocal Interruptions in the Dialogues of Unacquainted Pairs, Friends, and Couples
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, September 1, 1998; 17(3): 372 - 389.
[Abstract]